<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Overclock.at - Test Berichte Hardware , Übertakten und Overclocking</title>
        <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum</link>
        <description>Overclock.at - Test Berichte Hardware , Übertakten und Overclocking</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 14:45:37 +0200</lastBuildDate>
        
        <item>
            <title>[Tutorial] Siri fully ported to the iPhone 4 &amp; iPod Touch 4G with H1Siri</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=556&amp;goto=1513</link>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:56:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[[Tutorial] Siri fully ported to the iPhone 4 &amp; iPod Touch 4G with H1Siri


hier der Link zur Anleitung ... -&amp;gt; http://thetecherra.com/2011/12/04/tutorial-siri-fully-ported-to-the-iphone-4-ipod-touch-4g-with-h1siri/]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>GLBenchmark 2.1 (+Results)</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=555&amp;goto=1512</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:33:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[GLBenchmark 2.1 (+Results)]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>GLBenchmark 1.1.7.1 (+Results)</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=554&amp;goto=1511</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:33:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[GLBenchmark 1.1.7.1 (+Results)]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HTC HD2 T8585 (Leo)</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=553&amp;goto=1510</link>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:56:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[
HTC HD2 T8585 (Leo) - Spezifikation


	ge&auml;ndert von: air - 10.05.09, 03:07:13

HTC Touch 3G T3232 - Spezifikation

Format: Barren • GPRS/EDGE/HSDPA • WAP/MMS • A-GPS •

OS: Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional •
CPU: 528MHz Qualcomm MSM7225 •
RAM/ROM: 192MB/256MB •
Quadband •
Farbdisplay (65.536 Farben, 320x240 Pixel, 2.8&quot;, Touchscreen) •
Vibracall • polyphone Klingelt&ouml;ne • Video-/Mp3-Player • Digitalkamera (3.2MP) • Bluetooth 2.0 • USB 2.0 • WLAN (802.11b/g)

• 192MB Speicher • micro-SD Slot • Standbyzeit: ~450h • Gespr&auml;chszeit: ~6h • Gr&ouml;&szlig;e: 102x53.6x14.5mm • Gewicht: 96g • SAR-Wert: 0.61W/kg

------------------------------
CPU: QUALCOMM(R) 7225 (528 MHz)



]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HTC im Vormarsch</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=533&amp;goto=1509</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:46:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[



Info&acute;s mit ein paar ...

 Smartphone - Benchmark Werten 

vom HTC HD2 (Leo)




...kommt in den n&auml;chsten Tagen...









  ]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Modifying the Seagate 1.5TB Hard Drive: Unleash the Hidden </title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=449&amp;goto=1507</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:38:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Die magische Zahl f&uuml;r die 300 GB Marke ist: 589080586.

Mod auf 1099.512GB  
Mod auf 999.943GB  
Mod auf 301.609GB 


Test: WDC WD2001FASS auf 301GB Min:128.9 Max:149.6 Average:144.0 siehe Screeni: -&amp;gt; http://www.overclock.at/forum/attachment.php?id=2094

Test: ST31500341AS auf 301GB Min:115.7 Max:131.1 Average:124.9 siehe Screeni: -&amp;gt; http://www.overclock.at/forum/attachment.php?id=2096
]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Super Talent 2x1GB DDR2/800 CL4-3-4-8 (T800UX2GC4) - Review</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=237&amp;goto=1506</link>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:07:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[mit gigabyte P35-DS3P und e8600

PCI-E : +0.05v 
FSB: +0.05v
(G)MCH : +0.025
LL-Calibration: Enable
CPU Volt: 1.30000v

10x 368 at 3.680GHz (E8600) / DDR MP (3.20)
Memory Frequenz: 1178 C 5-6-6-18-2T at DDR:2.144v (+0.35v)
Pi3355-Dual in 84.63sec
------------------------------------------------------------
PCI-E : +0.05v
FSB: +0.05v
(G)MCH : +0.025
LL-Calibration: Enable
CPU Volt: 1.30000v

10x 372 at 3.720GHz (E8600) / DDR MP (3.20)
Memory Frequenz: 1190 C 5-6-6-18-2T at DDR:2.272v (+0.45v)
Pi3355-Dual in 83.75sec
------------------------------------------------------------
PCI-E : +0.05v
FSB: +0.05v
(G)MCH : +0.025
LL-Calibration: Enable
CPU Volt: 1.30000v

10x 380 at 3.800GHz (E8600) / DDR MP (3.20)
Memory Frequenz: 1216 C 5-7-7-19-2T at DDR:2.32v (+0.50v)
Pi3355-Dual in 82.61sec
------------------------------------------------------------
PCI-E : +0.05v
FSB: +0.05v
(G)MCH : +0.025
LL-Calibration: Enable
CPU Volt: 1.30000v

10x 390 at 3.900GHz (E8600) / DDR MP (3.20)
Memory Frequenz: 1248 C 5-7-7-19-2T at DDR:2.32v (+0.50v)
Pi3355-Dual in 80.67sec
------------------------------------------------------------
PCI-E : +0.05v
FSB: +0.05v
(G)MCH : +0.025
LL-Calibration: Enable
CPU Volt: 1.30000v

10x 398 at 3.980GHz (E8600) / DDR MP (4:5)
Memory Frequenz: 995 C 5-4-4-12-2T at DDR:2.144v (+0.35v)
Pi3355-Dual in 79.89sec
------------------------------------------------------------
]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Intel Dual-Core E5700 3.00GHz @ 4.255 GHz SLGTH (6-7-A R0-Stepping) Luftgekühlt IFX-14</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=552&amp;goto=1505</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:42:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Intel Dual-Core E5700 3.00GHz @ 4.255 GHz SLGTH (6-7-A R0-Stepping) Luftgek&uuml;hlt  (05.11.2011)

  (CPU-Z VERIFIED) (Max CPU-Clock: 4.33 GHz / 05-11-2011) 

  (CPU-Z VERIFIED) (Max FSB-Clock: 370x11.5 / 05-11-2011) 

Intel(R) Dual-Core E5700, LGA 775 (Wolfdale)
3.00 GHz, FSB 800 MHz, L2 Cache 2MB, Core 45nm, PCG 06

Prod.Code: BX80571E5700 S-spec: SLGTH
MM#: 908875 FPO/Batch#: 3044B631 (Costa Rica)
S/N: MC127152A1831
(Wafer-ID: MC12715 2A1831)

Test-Setup:
Motherboard: Gigabyte P35-DS3P (Bios:F12)
CPU: Intel Dual Core E5700 3.00GHz, Stepping: R0 (6-7-A) , (Costa Rica)
Vcore: 1.10v @ Load - 1.37v @ Load (siehe Diagramm)
K&uuml;hlung: Thermaltake IFX-14 (Luftk&uuml;hlung)
Geh&auml;use: 2x120 vorne / 1x120 hinten (3x120 auf IFX-14)
Memory: 2x 1024MB @ BIOS: tCL:4 tRCD:4 tRP:4 tRAS:10 tRRD:5 tRFC:35 tWR:3 tWTR:3 tRTP:3 (D9GKX / MT47H64M8B6-25E)
Netzteil: 450W
OS: Windows XP 32-bit
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Hexus-Pifast_3355_Dual-Tests:


CPU-Takt: / FSB / DDR-MHz / @LOAD / BIOS-Setting(Vcore) /Pi3355-Dual Time: / (max. CPU-Temp / max. IFX14-Temp-Out)

4.255 GHz / 370 / 888 / 1,376v / 1,3875 / Pi3355-Dual : 86,67s (max. CPU-Temp:62c) 5-5-5-14

4.198 GHz / 365 / 880 / 1,344v / 1,36250 / Pi3355-Dual : 87,73s (max. CPU-Temp:59c) 5-5-5-14

4.180 GHz / 380 / 912 / 1,31v / 1,33125 / Pi3355-Dual : 86,27s (max. CPU-Temp:55c) 5-5-5-14

4.136 GHz / 376 / 902 / 1,31v / 1,33125 / Pi3355-Dual : 87,02s (max. CPU-Temp:50c) 5-5-5-14

4.004 GHz / 286 / 954 / 1,264v / 1,2750 / Pi3355-Dual : 88,44s (max. CPU-Temp:52c) 5-5-5-14


4.015 GHz / 365 / 880 / 1,26v / 1,2875 / Pi3355-Dual : 90,09s (max. CPU-Temp:46c) 5-5-5-14 (Fenster offen)

4.050 GHz / 270 / 900 / 1,26v / 1,2750 / Pi3355-Dual : 90,63s (max. CPU-Temp:49c)

3.960 GHz / 360 / 864 / 1,26v / 1,2875 / Pi3355-Dual : 91,14s (max. CPU-Temp:52c) 5-5-5-13

4.008 GHz / 334 / 801 / 1,26v / 1,2875 / Pi3355-Dual : 93,52s (max. CPU-Temp:52c) 5-5-5-13

3.690 GHz / 246 / 820 / 1,15v / 1,1750 / Pi3355-Dual : 98,66s (max. CPU-Temp:44c)

3.400 GHz / 227 / 744 / 1,10v / 1,1125 / Pi3355-Dual : 107,33s (max. CPU-Temp:41c)




3.400 GHz / 227 / 744 / 1,10v / 1,11250 / Pi3355-Dual : 107,33s (max. CPU-Temp:41c)

----------------------------------------
Beim Hexus-Pifast 4.3-Dual ist ein Betrieb von 4.xxx GHz bei xxx FSB m&ouml;glich siehe:

CPU-Takt: / FSB / DDR-MHz / @LOAD / BIOS-Setting(Vcore) /Hexus-Pifast 4.3 Dual Time: / (max. CPU-Temp / max. IFX14-Temp-Out)
4.330 GHz / 333 / 833 / 1,44v / 1,4500 / Hexus-Pifast 4.3-Dual : 22,23s (max. CPU-Temp:66c

4613-576-576-1,44v in 17,02 (E8400...)
----------------------------------------


]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Modifying the Seagate 1.5TB Hard Drive: Unleash the Hidden </title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=449&amp;goto=1504</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:18:08 +0200</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Die magische Zahl f&uuml;r:

die 300 GB Marke ist: 589080586.

Mod auf 1099.512GB ( Number of LBAs 2147483647 ) 
Mod auf  999.943GB ( Number of LBAs 1953014444 ) 

Test: ST32000641AS auf 301GB Min:115.6 Max:139.1 Average:129.2 siehe Screeni: -&amp;gt; http://www.overclock.at/forum/attachment.php?id=2090

Test: ST32000641AS auf 1000GB Min:109.7 Max:137.1 Average:122.6 siehe Screeni: -&amp;gt; http://www.overclock.at/forum/attachment.php?id=2091

]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sanyo eneloop XX  (AAA - Akkus)</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=551&amp;goto=1503</link>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:35:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Sanyo eneloop 2000mAh (wei&szlig;), 1500 Ladezyklen, 25% Selbstentladung in 3 Jahren.

Voltcraft IPC-1 mit 500mA Ladestrom ~2.1-2.3Ah geladen.

Sanyo eneloop XX 2500mAh (schwarz), 500 Ladezyklen, 25% Selbstentladung in 1 Jahr.

Voltcraft IPC-1 mit 500mA Ladestrom ~2.7-2.8Ah geladen.

HR-3UWX-4BP
2011 03

Leerlaufspannung 1.30V alle 4
Voltcraft IPC-1 Discharge 500mA
1.13-1.14V bei 650mAh
1.10-1.11V bei 870mAh
1.10V bei 1073mAh
1.08V bei 1111mAh
1.05-1.06V bei 1207mAh
0.98-1.01V bei 1303mAh
0.90 ~1400-1500mAh

Charge 500mA
Full Full Full Full
2.68 2.70 2.72 2.77
1.45 
1.44
1.42
1.41 ~10min


Langzeiterfahrungen folgen...]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>online antiviren scan</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=12&amp;goto=1502</link>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:33:01 +0200</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[try ESET OnlineScan

link-&amp;gt;  http://www.eset.com/home/products/online-scanner
]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>3DMark2006</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=187&amp;goto=1501</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:45:50 +0200</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[
hier eine kurze zusammenfassung der letzten werte:

GeForce 470GTX / GF100 (Core:448/40/40nm/A3), 1280MB
GTX 470 (gpu:800/mem:900/shader:1600) i5-661 @ 4.38GHz GT1:n/a fps GT2:n/a fps HDR1: 151.5fps HDR2:100.6fps 


GeForce 285GTX / GT200 (Core:240/32/55nm/B1), 1024MB
GTX 285 (gpu:725/mem:1350/shader:1512) i7-920 @ 4.26GHz GT1:77.6fps GT2:80.3fps HDR1: 97.1fps HDR2:106.2fps CPU1:2.488 CPU2:3.684


GeForce 280GTX / GT200 (Core:240/32/65nm/A2), 1024MB
GTX 280 (gpu:756/mem:1296/shader:1566) QX9650 @ 4.22GHz GT1:71.9fps GT2:73.5fps HDR1: 95.3fps HDR2:90.2fps


GeForce 260GTX / GT200 (Core:216/28/55nm/B1), 896MB
GTX 260 (gpu:738/mem:1320/shader:1476)  i7-920 @ 3.90GHz  GT1:68.9fps GT2:67.1fps HDR1: 87.9fps HDR2:90.6fps







----------------------------------------------------------

hier kurz angetestet eine gute alte 285GTX mit i7 2600k

GeForce 285GTX / GT200 (Core:240/32/55nm/B1), 1024M
GTX 285 (gpu:738/mem:1377/shader:1548) i7-2600k @ 4.50GHz GT1:78.1fps GT2:80.9fps HDR1: 95.7fps HDR2:106.6fps CPU1: CPU2:
http://www.overclock.at/forum/attachment.php?id=XXXX&amp;
]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Intel Core i7-2600K 3.40GHz @ 4.400 GHz SR00C (6-A-7 D2-Stepping) Luftgekühlt</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=549&amp;goto=1500</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:56:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Erste CB R10 Ergebnisse zeigen die sehr hohe Performance dieser CPU:





]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Asus P8P67 Deluxe (Intel P67 Chipset) Rev.1.03, Bios:1053 - Overclock Review</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=550&amp;goto=1499</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:37:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Asus P8P67 Deluxe (Intel P67 Chipset) Rev.1.03, Bios:1053 - Overclock Review 

Clock Generator: ICS9DB803DGLF

Test-Setup:
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe (Bios:1053)
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k 3.40GHz, SR00C (6-A-7 D2-Stepping) 
Vcore: 1.xxv @ Load - 1.xxv @ Load (siehe Diagramm)
K&uuml;hlung: Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme True Cooper
Memory: 2x 2048MB
Netzteil: Corsair TX 950W (CMPSU-950TX)
OS: Windows 7


Erste Pifast3355 Quad Tests zeigen: sehr hohe Performance     

  Details kommen noch , Thread im Aufbau ...   



]]></description>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Intel Core i7-2600K 3.40GHz @ 4.400 GHz SR00C (6-A-7 D2-Stepping) Luftgekühlt</title>
            <link>http://www.overclock.at/forum/topic.php?id=549&amp;goto=1498</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:05:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Intel Core i7-2600K 3.40GHz @ 4.400 GHz SR00C (6-A-7 D2-Stepping) Luftgek&uuml;hlt (19.02.2010)


Intel&reg; Core™ i7-2600k Processor , LGA 1155 (Sandy Bridge), Cores: 4 / Threads: 8 
Freq. 3.40 GHz, DMI 5 GT/s, Cache 8MB, Core 32nm, PCG ???
L2-Cache: 4x 256kB • L3-Cache: 8MB
Prod.Code: BX80623I72600K S-spec: SR00C
FPO/Batch#: L041B200 (Malay)
(Wafer-ID: 0337)

Test-Setup:
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe (Bios:1053)
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k 3.40GHz, SR00C (6-A-7 D2-Stepping) 
Vcore: 1.xxv @ Load - 1.xxv @ Load (siehe Diagramm)
K&uuml;hlung: Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme True Cooper
Memory: 2x 2048MB
Netzteil: Corsair TX 950W (CMPSU-950TX)
OS: Windows 7


Erste Pifast3355 Quad Tests zeigen: sehr hohe Performance     

  Details kommen noch , Thread im Aufbau ...   

Da die CPU sehr neu ist m&ouml;chten wir einige Zeit abwarten bez&uuml;glich maximaler Vcore Spannung beim &Uuml;bertakten.

Die CPU welche wir testen,  hat bisher bei allen Tests noch nie mehr als 1.29vCore Spannung gesehen.

Es ist wichtig , hier die Angaben von Intel durchzulesen:


Sandybridge maximum safe voltages

Core Voltage - Not recommended too exceed 1.38v, doing so could kill the CPU, we therefor recommend a range of 1.325-1.350v if overclocking.

Memory Voltage - Intel recommend 1.50v plus/minus 5% which means upto 1.58v is the safe recommended limit. In our testing we have found 1.65v has caused no issues.

BCLK Base Clock - This is strictly a NO, anyone using base clock overclocking could/will cause damange to CPU/Mainboard. (Set manually to 100)

PLL Voltage - Do not exceed 1.9v!!

Processor - Basically we recommend customers not to exceed 1.35v to play it safe, all our bundles are set at 1.3250v or lower, anything over 1.38v will limit CPU lifespan and anything over 1.42v will likely kill the CPU or severely limit its lifespan.

Memory - Intel recommend 1.50v plus/minus 5% which means 1.60v is the ideal safe maximum, but we have found in our testing all 1.65v memory is fine. We have also found most new 1.65v like Corsair XMS3 will run at its rated timings with just 1.50-1.55v which is well within Intel specifications.

 So people upgrading to Sandybridge you can still use your old DDR3, but we do recommend you run it at 1.60v or less. We are shipping most of our bundles which feature Corsair XMS at 1.50v-1.55v at rated timings. We&#039;ve also discussed with Asus and MSI regarding voltages for memory and they also confirm in their testing 1.65v caused no issues with reliability.

Base Clock - To put it simple if you value the life of your components, do not overclock using base clock!

PLL Voltage - Again do not exceed 1.9v!


Not all CPU&#039;s are as fragile as others, we have experimented upto 1.50v Vcore and 1.70v memory and had zero issues with reliability,

 

im anhang die platine und der k&uuml;hler auf der die cpu zum einsatz kommt...






]]></description>
        </item>

    </channel>
</rss>
